Book Cover
Title A Wrinkle in Time
Author Madeleine L'Engle
Cover Art ---
Publisher Dell - 1982
First Printing 1962
Book Cover
Title A Wind in the Door
Author Madeleine L'Engle
Cover Art ---
Publisher Dell - 1983
First Printing 1973
Book Cover
Title A Swiftly Tilting Planet
Author Madeleine L'Engle
Cover Art ---
Publisher Dell - 1981
First Printing 1978
Book Cover
Title Many Waters
Author Madeleine L'Engle
Cover Art Taeeun Yoo
Publisher Square Fish - 2007
First Printing 1986
Book Cover
Title An Acceptable Time
Author Madeleine L'Engle
Cover Art Taeeun Yoo
Publisher Square Fish - 2007
First Printing 1989
Book Cover
Title The Graphic Novel
Author Madeleine L'Engle
Illustrator Hope Larson
Publisher Margaret Ferguson Books - 2012
First Printing Margaret Ferguson Books - 2012
Category Fantasy / SF
Warnings None
Main Characters Meg, Charles Wallace, Calvin, Sandy, Dennys, Polly
Main Elements Unicorns, Angels, time travel
Website madeleinelengle.com




Click to read the summaryA Wrinkle in Time

Click to read the summaryA Wind in the Door

Click to read the summaryA Swiftly Tilting Planet

Click to read the summaryMany Waters

Click to read the summaryAn Acceptable Time

Click to read the summaryThe Graphic Novel




You know how some childhood favorites remain amazing forever and time cannot tarnish how much you love them? Well, apparently that didn't work for A Wrinkle in Time for me. Ok, it wasn't a favorite to start with, and the main thing I really remembered was the picture of the ant that could walk across a wrinkle in the edge of cloth to explain the tesseract (which it turns out, is not a term invented by L'Engle, it's an actual mathematical thing). But when I reread it when the movie came out I was puzzled as to why people thought this was such an amazing book. And of course, the thing that adults never understand about kids, I totally missed the Christian aspects of the story, though they are far more explicit than in the Narnia series, in fact it kind of tries to bash it into your head it's so in your face, but I didn't remember any of that at all. I just thought the flying centaurs were cool.

I like the fact that Meg is kind of nerdy, and there is so much science behind this story I originally pegged it as an SF series (though as the series went along and the science got a bit silly and the Christian "love will fix everything" theme became predominant I had to shift it to fantasy, it's just that science works in a fantasy novel - gravity, inertia, friction don't stop working in a world of magic, but SF has no room for anything remotely magical, and saving the world with a big hug just isn't really scientific, sorry). But don't get me wrong, there is nothing bad about exposing kids to scientific principles, even in a fantasy setting. And I have nothing against the Christian themes either. But I just found the story a bit disjointed, and the ending unsatisfying, I mean yes, they rescue their father, but the big evil is still out there. They didn't defeat it, they just escaped it. And then it is NEVER mentioned in any of the subsequent books!!! Like it never happened. In fact by the last one the father seems to have forgotten his weird experience and refuses to believe the experience of his granddaughter Polly.

The worst one is A Wind in the Door, the "fix everything with a hug" theme is the strongest here, and the main character is an angel which happens to be a confusing mass of wings and eyes, and shrinking down to near quantum size in a world where people can't see with their eyes but can use a kind of telepathy called kything, was downright incomprehensible. Maybe kids are able to imagine what L'Engle is describing, but it was just too weird for me.

A Swiftly Tilting planet I actually enjoyed. Not just because the main character Gaudior is a unicorn, but it had understandable time travel, as well as Charles Wallace finding himself reliving other people's lives, looking for a way to change the past without irrevocably destorying the future.

Many Waters is a really odd Noah's Ark story. It was a little long without too much going on, overt sexual scenarios where nephilim are trying to seduce human women. On the other hand it did have virtual or quantum unicorns, that could only be held in one place if being observed, like a particle. And the word "slut" was used. My jaw dropped. I mean I know L'Engle is trying to represent the types of people God is going to wipe out with the flood, but one of the twins using that word just shocked me in a kids book. Clearly we're now in young adult stories! It has some interesting characters and ideas in it, but it just meandered and I found it boring overall.

An Acceptable Time had a similar problem of taking forever before anything interesting really started to happen. And hey, wasn't Dr. Louise actually Louise the Larger in A Wind in the Door? And now she's the biggest skeptic of them all? I'm confused. And mountains do not go from being like the Rockies, jagged and snowcapped, to being like the soft, rounded Appalachians in just three thousand years. Three hundred thousand maybe, but if a mountain would wear down that fast, the pyramids would be gone by now too. And by the halfway point I was about ready to scream if someone said "three thousand years" again. Maybe L'Engle thought her readers didn't do well with numbers or time and needed to be reminded every second page? But once the story really got going, there was actually some action that kept the reader interested, and some love triangles to keep things complicated.

All in all, I was expected a series of books I would love, but in the end found them to be disappointing and even kind of boring, if not flat out confusing and baffling. It's funny though, I've read her non-SFF books about the Austins and really enjoyed those, simple stories about a group of kids growing up in a rural town, those were beautiful and nostalgic to read. But this, her more famous series, is just plain weird. But then kids may understand things that even computer engineers (who briefly considered actually going into astronomy but then decided she didn't like to work nights) can't follow.

July 2022
The Graphic Novel - I was plundering the library for all it's science fiction graphic novels and was curious to see how one would adapt this one. Truth was, it was a bit weird. Not that the original isn't weird, but Charles Wallace's giant eyes just came off as creepy. I didn't remember Meg being quite so annoying, I know she was a troubled kid but she just got on my nerves. And there are some things that work better left to the imagination. It was a faithful retelling with quality artwork, just not sure it was required, but if it gets some kids to read more because it has "pictures", then I guess that's all to the good.




Posted: January - April 2019

HOME BACK EMAIL

Background, images and content (unless otherwise noted) are © SunBlind
Do not use without permission.